Apparently the SOA charts I put together tell the story better than they'd seen anywhere else.
Yes I too have stated this.  The question I have is "Will customers really embrace SOA or will they stick with monolithic applications?"
I like to think of the Linux kernel, it is monolithlic, although well structured.   Other kernels, such as the one in Apple's MacOS are "microkernels" they have a small basic kernel and you plug higher level functions (eg. I/O) into it.
Which is the better architecture?  I don't know.  Although Apple do have a prettier GUI :)
+++
I was speaking with someone who said he has made a mint in property investment, he said he uses Google Earth to assay (assess?) the value of a proposed investment.  He has a simple algorithm that takes into account how many major roads pass by etc.  Interesting use of Google Earth I thought!
+++
PS. I can see your previous draft!  My guess is that you didn't want to risk disheartening me .. don't worry I am quite cognisant of my chances should A try to get K back, in that case I can only appeal to God to soften her heart and let her see the wishes of her child.  I am confident :)
PPS.  Ubiquitous protocol required yes, but also a PC in every home too (otherwise there is nothing to connect together).  What was the sequence ...
1. Computers came into existence
2. The military and academia connected them together (TCP/IP)
3. Microsoft put a PC in every home
4. The network from (2) extended to (3) - like a creeping virus?
?
Saturday, June 09, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment