Interesting article regarding "global warming." It seems there's fairly good evidence to suggest that global warming has essentially flattened out since 1999. And there's a competing hypothesis -- the sun's activities contribute most to global warming and cooling -- but that hypothesis is all but ignored in favor of the far more lucrative theory that man's activities are the sole contributor.
If "science" was as blind to human ambition as some hold, they'd explore the competing hypothesis with as much vigor as the currently popular one. But of course they don't. And they won't. Because we can't do anything about the sun's activities, so there's no money to be made, either in grant money or in scare tactics.
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment